selij Posted March 8, 2022 Share Posted March 8, 2022 https://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...use-of-commons 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledhed1 Posted March 8, 2022 Share Posted March 8, 2022 This'll never go anywhere. A politician trying to boost favor in his constituency. The matter won't go beyond the BBBoC investigation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_budweiser Posted March 9, 2022 Share Posted March 9, 2022 I really don't get it, the wrong fighter won for me but there was the whole fight was scrappy. I sent selij a message (sure it was selij) saying this is going to be a split decision. Theres been a lot bigger robberys in boxing than this fight! @Ledhed1 has it spot on "A politician trying to boost favor in his constituency" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cableaddict Posted March 10, 2022 Share Posted March 10, 2022 There are no big robberies and little robberies. Only robberies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_budweiser Posted March 10, 2022 Share Posted March 10, 2022 Ian John Lewis downgraded from A Star Class to A Class Official. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledhed1 Posted March 10, 2022 Share Posted March 10, 2022 That's the kind of transparency boxing commissions should practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cableaddict Posted March 10, 2022 Share Posted March 10, 2022 (edited) ... And this results in fukall. I J L will still get the same assignments as before, the fight is not declared a N/C, and the same crap will continue ad nauseum...... And it's hilarious that they can't even present a cohesive line of BS: They claim that only ONE card was suspect, & hence TAYLOR STILL WON, YET THEY RECOMMEND THAT CATRALL (who they say lost the fight) BE MADE THE MANDATORY IN ALL THE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. (but not in their own, oh no.... ) Yeah, that makes perfect sense. What a load of pigs bollocks. Edited March 10, 2022 by Cableaddict 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledhed1 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 I praised the commission for publicizing the results of its investigation and I stand by that - when do you ever see that? never - but the sanction against IJL was harsh. They accepted Loughlin's card (113-112 Taylor) but they downgrade IJL based on one round? The sanction was merely to show the public they acted in some way. And if they were satisfied with the result, why do they insist Catterall be granted a mandatory rematch? They're having it both ways; keeping up appearances making it look like they have backbone. If you found the result to be within reason, just say so rather than placating the uproar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonRingRules Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 - - I keep hearing that Cat retreated too much in the latter half of the fight, but no matter, given both fighter's reported poor performance stinkmeter descriptions, I ain't seeking it out on youtube. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now