iamasadlittleboy Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Not who actually won, but who deserved to have gotten the decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavpowell Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Valuev - holyfiekld wasn;t effective enough for my money, and I think people just wanted an excuse to further slag off Valuev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edsel77x Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Fight should have never been made. Nobody won anything in that fight. Absolutely nothing of note came from the bout. I have nothing against Valuez, but Holyfield should not be fighting, Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemurphy Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 i think if Holyfield had still been a Don King Fighter and Valuev not one, then the decision likely swings the other direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donlevy Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Considering he made an attempt to actually throw punches,I went for Holyfield.I watched the fight live on a good stream and had Holyfield winning comfortably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynbrawler Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 I personally thought that Holyfield won by about 4 or 5 rounds. It was a total snoozefest, where neither guy did much of note, but the punches that did land, and any actual boxing was almost all done by Holyfield. It will seem like an excuse to knock Haye again, but if you watch the 2 fights side by side, I think if anything, Holyfield was more effective than Haye was. The main difference maybe being the fact that Haye was barely caught at all, compared to the few flurries Valuev managed against Holyfield. I thought Holyfield had a more convincing win, though the record books will say otherwise. Like a few people have already mentioned though, Holyfield should never be fighting, and if anything it simply highlights how poor Valuev is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grapevine241 Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 only watched it the one time, but i had it scored for holyfield. now david haye is "champ" LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skav Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 I think this question would be better for Haye vs Valuev, as a lot of people, including the SKY commentary team, had it for Valuev. But Holyfield won this one, for me. I'm surprised the vote is close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donlevy Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 I haven't seen the Sky version,heard they were quite negative in their commentary towards Haye.I saw the German version and had Haye winning by quite a large margin.I'm not going to pretend that he won them clearly,but he seemed to land the better punches to me.Could be wrong on that one,and I have no urge to go back and score it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now