Jump to content

Bernard Hopkins vs Marvin Hagler/Tommy Hearns


RAZZ-MCFC

Recommended Posts

After an article was posted about Hopkins saying he'd stop Tommy Hearns, how do you guys see fights between Hopkins and Hearns/Hagler playing out?

 

All 3 are obviously elite level fighters, but who do you think would win?

 

I know a lot of you will say Hearns and Hagler easily, but with Hopkins spoiling tactics, i don't think it'd be as wide as a lot of you may think.

 

There would be no knockouts in either fights in my opinion.

 

Tommy was a great boxer, but with Bernard's great inside fighting skills and ability to rough it up, could Hearns be as effective a boxer as what we've seen?

 

thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
I think Hopkins could spoil Hagler but i still think Hagler would win on points eventually. I'm not sure how well Hopkins could spoil Hearns' tactics. Hearns was relentless and i'm not sure how Hopkins could stop him punching. I think Hagler and Hearns both beat Hopkins by UD.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Marvin Hagler/Tommy Hearns

 

Hopkins often held and found various other ways to spoil and make interesting matchups into borefests. He would not be able to trick these two veterans, nor would he be able to KO either of them.

Both would imo smash him to bits and massively outwork him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Marvin Hagler/Tommy Hearns

 

Hopkins often held and found various other ways to spoil and make interesting matchups into borefests. He would not be able to trick these two veterans, nor would he be able to KO either of them.

Both would imo smash him to bits and massively outwork him.

A peak Hagler would have beaten Hopkins the same way Calzaghe did (pressure and volume) but more decisively. Hearns would be more of a pick 'em but I tend to think his speed would give him the edge. I'm not sure Hopkins' spoiling tactics would have much effect. I don't recall either being "spoiled" in their long careers. Even Leonard would have been beaten if Richard Steele had been less tolerant of his holding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Marvin Hagler/Tommy Hearns

 

The only won who really beats Bernard Hopkins is father time and he often loses to Hopkins.

Hopkins would go the distance either way but would have trouble sustaining a convincing assault on a peak stocking Hagler ,despite all the clever tricks Hopkins has in his arsenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...