Jump to content

Nat Fleischer On The Push To Make Ali Great


LondonRingRules
 Share

Recommended Posts

After the magnificent performance, skill, heart, and courage of Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali in the 1971 Fight of the Century that roused not only a country, but the rest of the world, there was an heavy push back on Nat Fleischer to revise his All Time Top 10 Heavyweight rankings.

Nat, of course, was the founding father of gathering and cataloging fighter records, and in time because of the seminal nature of his work, his copious contributions, his ringside witness to so many great fights, he and Ring Magazine became synonymous as The Bible of Boxing, so any of his pronouncements and observations were literally taken as being passed as the Word of God. Boxing fans studied his edicts religiously as Nat coasted along secure in being at top of his game.

But the landscape soon changed when Ali was convicted of dodging the draft and suspended from boxing for 3 1/2 years as he battled all the way to the US Supreme Court. The push to make Ali great began to gather steam during this Ali lull. Miraculously, Ali’s conviction was overturned and he was allowed to return to boxing.

Then the unthinkable. Down goes Ali. Frazier whoops Ali.

A very interesting period piece of journalism followed as Fleischer holds his ground, not stubbornly, but rather in well thought out logical explanations that may have given succor to the larger base of boxing fans, but did nothing to satisfy Ali supporters. They incredibly insisted their man won the Fight of the Century and demanded that Ali be put in Nat’s top 10, a veritable flood filling his mailbox every month.

400px-Frazier_drops_Ali.jpgDown Goes Ali, Down Goes Ali

 

Now as we have over 40 years of hindsight, it’s easy for moderns to look at Nat’s list and see how silly it looks, but back then he was one of the few willing to publish such a list at the risk of great personal criticism. One thing to note is the fighters on his list were long retired, meaning no way was Nat going to rate some young whippersnapper just entering the middle of his career. Since he passed in 1972, he never got to see Ali upset George Foreman in Zaire, so we can’t say how that might of altered his view of things, though I suspect very little as to adding a currently active heavyweight to his list. We can say within a year or two after the Foreman upset as I recollect, Ring came out with a revised list that had Ali at or near the top of the 10 in a vast rearrangement of Nat’s list. In the encapsulated words of the immortal Chuck Berry and Hank Williams, “Roll over Beethoven ’cause the big dog’s moving in”

 

Nat in his own words here:

 

https://roberto00.wordpress.com/2015/10/09/nat-fleischer-on-the-push-to-make-ali-great/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Nat Fleischer On The Push To Make Ali Great

 

Ring Magazine founder, Fleischer inducted posthumously into HOF in 1990 after his demise in '72. Its well known where his interests lay and on who's payroll he was on Bobby. :ranger:

 

therefore as you said, with hindsight, everything he said will forever be taken with a pinch of salt. And certainly not the "respect" he craved. He only listed Joe Louis 6th and his first 5 HW's all fought before 1930..........

 

Although Ali was the greatest fighter on earth IMHO.

 

The Phantom Punch (involved Fleischer's opinion too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Nat Fleischer On The Push To Make Ali Great

 

No. I dont do p4p lists on here any more, as you well know, current or past because no one applies the correct criteria. It just ends up as a farcical "faves" list due to a certain Eastern European steroid monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...