gemmell100 Posted December 5, 2009 Share Posted December 5, 2009 tyson in 3. brutal ko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBride Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Prime Tyson beats anyone.......and that means anyone! Joe Louis would have schooled him. George Foreman, and Joe Frazier would both of hurt him for fun, and Ali would have either sent him back to his pigeon loft, or caused him to have a mental breakdown, before he ever got near the ring. Ali would have ridiculed the retard to the point of madness, just for fun. You just can not begin to realise how much fun the great man could have had with that pathetic high pitched lisp. mlol/ mlol/ mlol/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grapevine241 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Prime Tyson beats anyone.......and that means anyone! Joe Louis would have schooled him. George Foreman, and Joe Frazier would both of hurt him for fun, and Ali would have either sent him back to his pigeon loft, or caused him to have a mental breakdown, before he ever got near the ring. Ali would have ridiculed the handsome fellow to the point of madness, just for fun. You just can not begin to realise how much fun the great man could have had with that pathetic high pitched lisp. mlol/ mlol/ mlol/ LMAO i never thought of it that way but you are exactly right. ali would have won that fight before he stepped in the ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBride Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Its true grapevine. He actually mentally terrified the 60's version of Tyson ( Sonny Liston ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paintballdan Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Depends when. In the early days, Mike would have got inside and smashed him up & that's the only scenario I want to entertain! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imasa Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Tyson inside in 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
battlingsiki Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Tyson easily. Not even a contest man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheelchair Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 A prime Tyson would be way too fast. A quick night for Mike I reckon, KO 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheils Posted February 27, 2010 Share Posted February 27, 2010 Left to the body, right to the chin - a Tyson stoppage win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obama Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Tyson KO 1. If Wlad had a good chin I could see him winning, but no chance with the one he's got... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atahualpaFX Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Mike Tyson (June 27, 1988) would have beaten ALL heavyweights before and after - in their respective primes. Tyson would have knocked out either of the Klitschkos inside 6 rounds boxing// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheelchair Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Mike Tyson (June 27, 1988) would have beaten ALL heavyweights before and after - in their respective primes. Tyson would have knocked out either of the Klitschkos inside 6 rounds boxing// In Wlad's case I think you mean six minutes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atahualpaFX Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Mike Tyson (June 27, 1988) would have beaten ALL heavyweights before and after - in their respective primes. Tyson would have knocked out either of the Klitschkos inside 6 rounds boxing// In Wlad's case I think you mean six minutes! You're probably right, Wheelchair goodp// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dulais_valley Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 I was suprised to see Wlad as opposed to Vitali also! Can't see Wlad lasting past a couple of rounds with Tyson. Vitali on the other hand - prime for prime - I think wins every time. Turth is no-one has ever really hurt Vitali in the ring and I don't see Tyson being a much harder puncher in absolute terms than someone like Lewis. Sure he blew out a hell of a lot of fighters but I don't know he would have had the answers if he landed and Vitali was still standing gthere. Lewis landed bombs on Vitali and won the fight on a cut he opened up. The way to beat Vitali is to outbox him over twelve and I just can't see the much smaller Tyson sustaining that effort against a 250lb, supremely fit fighter. Vitali has shown even at his ripe old age now that he can throw unprecedented numbers of punches for a heavy fight (I remember Mart posting some compubox figures that were astounding over on banter) and would use his size to wear Tyson down. Tyson cracks under the pressure for me. Who is the better boxer with better history? Tyson no doubt. Would he beat Vitali? Not in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldenbhoy Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Vitali is the tougher fight without doubt for Tyson but i still belive prime tyson has to much for him. Prime Tyson v Wlad and his chin is not compeitive because Tyson will land on it eventualy and when he does its good night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamasadlittleboy Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 ...I can't be arsed to check (it's 2:15 after all)...but did Tyson fight a genuinely tall heavy with a good reach? (Briggs was 6-5 though his reach isn't listed on boxrec and Holmes wasn't that tall). Would he be able to detonate on a guy 7+ inches taller than himself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WelshDevilRob Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 ...I can't be arsed to check (it's 2:15 after all)...but did Tyson fight a genuinely tall heavy with a good reach? (Briggs was 6-5 though his reach isn't listed on boxrec and Holmes wasn't that tall). Would he be able to detonate on a guy 7+ inches taller than himself? Tony Tucker height 6′ 5″ / 196cm reach 82″ / 208cm Carl Williams height 6′ 4″ / 193cm Jose Ribalta height 6′ 5″ / 195cm reach 80″ / 203cm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzledaz Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 yeah a prime tyson and it wouldnt be much of a contest.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheelchair Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 ...I can't be arsed to check (it's 2:15 after all)...but did Tyson fight a genuinely tall heavy with a good reach? (Briggs was 6-5 though his reach isn't listed on boxrec and Holmes wasn't that tall). Would he be able to detonate on a guy 7+ inches taller than himself? Tony Tucker height 6′ 5″ / 196cm reach 82″ / 208cm Carl Williams height 6′ 4″ / 193cm Jose Ribalta height 6′ 5″ / 195cm reach 80″ / 203cm Tyson also KO'd a guy by the name of Eddie Richardson who was 6 foot 6. He had a 10-2 record at the time did Richardson, and Mike did him in just 77 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlp Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 Tyson in 5 but Wlad wins a couple of rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAZZ-MCFC Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Prime Tyson beats anyone.......and that means anyone! Ali would have either sent him back to his pigeon loft, or caused him to have a mental breakdown, before he ever got near the ring. lmao that sentence had me in stitches, nice one mate a prime Tyson beats Wlad any day of the week for me, as soon as a couple of his bombs land on that glass jaw it's game over for WK Wlad would be too scared to come out of his shell and it'd just be a matter of how quick Tyson would get him out of there not about who would win or by what method Tyson inside 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daman Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 Tyson would win imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James McKnight83 Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs Mike Tyson Prime Tyson KO's Wlad brutally. Wlad is good, but no match for Tyson at all. Once Tyson slips that jab and lands his first power punch, he's got Wlad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs Mike Tyson Comparing Wlads jab to Lewis jab is like comparing Apples to Oranges. Lewis jab was a weapon that he would hunt you down with, keep you off balance and follow up with a big right straight or uppercut. Wlads jab is to create distance between his opponent and his chin. Not that thats a bad thing at all, but I personally think a non authoritarian jab like Wlads would get slipped by Tyson all night long. Im not a revisionist when it comes to Tyson, as a lot of people seem to be these days, but I really truthfully believe that Tyson had the head movement and power to end this one within a round. Not to do a disservice to Wlad, but he just doesnt have it in him to keep Tyson off him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonRingRules Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs Mike Tyson Prime Tyson KO's Wlad brutally. Wlad is good, but no match for Tyson at all. Once Tyson slips that jab and lands his first power punch, he's got Wlad. --- Well James, it goes like this: 20 year old Tyson knocks out 20 year old Wlad early in a good but quick fight. He also knocks out any other future 20 yr old champ, so no shame there. The 37 year old Wlad knocks out 37 year old Tyson easy in mid rounds as well as any other 37 year old former and future champ. The fight the usual suspects should be looking for is when each is at their best, but the usual suspects lack the honor needed to guide their thinking into coherence. Tyson's best performance is hands down Michael Spinks when Tyson was a few days from turning 22. Wlad's best performance was a complete clowning of Mr. Pinky Haye who saw the deck a dozen times incredibly and never saw a jab he didn't eat and ask for more. Spinks is not the the same stylistic matchup as 35 yr old Wlad and Haye ain't the same as 21 yr old Tyson. Good scrap that I always favored Tyson in, but not a guarantee as each would be facing the best the other has ever seen. That's the way it goes and the reason odds are given in every fight. Every fighter has a chance to win and every favorite has a chance to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now