Jump to content

King of 140


bdub2112

Recommended Posts

It has to be between Bradley and Alexander, but I don;t think either of them are the very very elite in boxing and both of them are beatable.

Khan has the skills to beat them infact, but I just see him getting steamrollered inside a couple of rounds due to his chin.

I reckon Bradley beats Alexander, but they both have a few decent wins now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alexander got me on board as a fan with his knockout display over Urango last time out.

 

He looked the business against Witter, also, but I felt Witter was, perhaps, getting a bit over the hill.

 

I would pick Alexander to reign supreme out of the lot of them.

 

I've never really been impressed with Bradley, to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bradley is the king at 140 and has proven it. alexander and khan are a toss up for #2. alexander beat urango and witter (who quit out of nowhere), so his resume is very thin. like him or not, khan dominated malignaggi and kotelnik. so i have 140 like this:

 

1. bradley

2. khan

3. alexander

4. maidana

5. kotelnik (yes i realize kotelnik beat maidana)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bradley is the king at 140 and has proven it. alexander and khan are a toss up for #2. alexander beat urango and witter (who quit out of nowhere), so his resume is very thin. like him or not, khan dominated malignaggi and kotelnik. so i have 140 like this:

 

1. bradley

2. khan

3. alexander

4. maidana

5. kotelnik (yes i realize kotelnik beat maidana)

 

There is no king currently. Bradley is top rated but Devon Alexander was more impressive against Witter than Bradley and Alexander is a unified belt holder. A KO of Urango is also far more impressive than any win to Bradley's name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bradley is the king at 140 and has proven it. alexander and khan are a toss up for #2. alexander beat urango and witter (who quit out of nowhere), so his resume is very thin. like him or not, khan dominated malignaggi and kotelnik. so i have 140 like this:

 

1. bradley

2. khan

3. alexander

4. maidana

5. kotelnik (yes i realize kotelnik beat maidana)

 

 

You also have to give some bearing to the fact that Alexander won a unification bout, and holds half of the legitimate titles at the weight, and the manner in which they have both performed so far.

Alexander doesn't appear to have any weaknesses, he's an all-round great fighter, though not exceptional. Khan has a very weak chin, and is top heavy on speed, which is only going to be effective against a portion of carefully selected opponents, such as Malignaggi and Kotelnik...

If they ever fought, I could never choose Khan over Alexander in a million years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bradley is the king at 140 and has proven it. alexander and khan are a toss up for #2. alexander beat urango and witter (who quit out of nowhere), so his resume is very thin. like him or not, khan dominated malignaggi and kotelnik. so i have 140 like this:

 

1. bradley

2. khan

3. alexander

4. maidana

5. kotelnik (yes i realize kotelnik beat maidana)

 

 

You also have to give some bearing to the fact that Alexander won a unification bout, and holds half of the legitimate titles at the weight, and the manner in which they have both performed so far.

Alexander doesn't appear to have any weaknesses, he's an all-round great fighter, though not exceptional. Khan has a very weak chin, and is top heavy on speed, which is only going to be effective against a portion of carefully selected opponents, such as Malignaggi and Kotelnik...

If they ever fought, I could never choose Khan over Alexander in a million years.

 

bradley did unify then they took his belt back. in fact, alexander fought for the title that went vacant after bradley was forced to give it up. i agree with you that i would choose alexander over khan but i dont base a ranking on what if i base it on real accomplishments.

 

bradley is the king at 140 and has proven it. alexander and khan are a toss up for #2. alexander beat urango and witter (who quit out of nowhere), so his resume is very thin. like him or not, khan dominated malignaggi and kotelnik. so i have 140 like this:

 

1. bradley

2. khan

3. alexander

4. maidana

5. kotelnik (yes i realize kotelnik beat maidana)

 

There is no king currently. Bradley is top rated but Devon Alexander was more impressive against Witter than Bradley and Alexander is a unified belt holder. A KO of Urango is also far more impressive than any win to Bradley's name.

 

i disagree. bradley's wins over witter, holt, and peterson are much more impressive than alexander's one real win over urango. also, like i said above, bradley did unify two titles but was stripped.

 

TBH i was never really impressed by bradley until he beat lamont peterson. alexander just hasnt faced top competition like bradley and khan have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devon Alexander.

 

the guy is quality and has everything, only thing that is missing is experience and that'll come

 

i've got it like:

 

1.) Alexander

2.) Bradley

3.) Khan

 

it's a shame, Valero could of been the man to be 140 king and IMO would of beat any of these 3 once he'd got a few more fights under his belt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...