Jump to content

No Hopkins v Green


Faulks
 Share

Recommended Posts

After Australian boxing star Danny Green knocked out Roy Jones in the first round on Dec. 2, ruining an already-signed deal Jones had for a rematch with Bernard Hopkins in early 2010, talks quickly turned to a Hopkins-Green bout.

 

But those discussions ended Tuesday night with the sides going their separate ways because of a money dispute, promoter Gary Shaw, who is serving as Green's adviser, told ESPN.com.

 

The crux of the dispute, according to Shaw, was Hopkins' demand for a 60-40 split of the money in his favor instead of the 50-50 deal Shaw said they had previously agreed upon.

 

"Green will not move off 50-50," Shaw said. "B-Hop will wait forever for 60-40."

 

Neither Golden Boy's Richard Schaefer, Hopkins' promoter, nor Hopkins could be reached for comment.

 

Shaw and Green met in Los Angeles two weeks ago with Schaefer to peruse numbers and hash out a deal for a cruiserweight fight that would have taken place in April on pay-per-view in Australia and on HBO in the United States.

 

"We thought we had a deal at 50-50 when we left Richard's office. We had gone over all the numbers Danny did in the Roy Jones fight," Shaw said.

 

Shaw said he then went to HBO and negotiated the rights fee with the network, which had offered more than $2 million for the bout. The scenario called for the fight to be on a Sunday afternoon in Australia so it could be televised live in the U.S. in prime time on Saturday night.

 

"After I met with HBO, Danny spoke with Bernard once or twice and Bernard suddenly changed the deal," Shaw said. "He told Danny he wanted all of the HBO money because he was bringing HBO, which wasn't accurate because I was the one who went to HBO and negotiated the money."

 

Shaw said the deal they had previously agreed to was 50-50 with Hopkins being guaranteed at least $3 million.

 

"Once Bernard changed the deal, Danny said it was a non-starter," Shaw said. "So let them go their separate ways."

 

Green will look for alternative opponents, Shaw said. Among the possibilities, according to Shaw, are former super middleweight titlist Manny Siaca and former light heavyweight champ Antonio Tarver, whom Shaw has worked with for the past few years.

 

Hopkins (50-5-1, 32 KOs), the former middleweight and light heavyweight champ, easily outpointed Enrique Ornelas on Dec. 2 in his first fight since winning a lopsided decision against middleweight champ Kelly Pavlik in their light heavyweight bout 14 months ago.

 

Hopkins, who turns 45 on Jan. 15, and Jones were in tune-up fights on the same date ahead of their planned showdown. But the 38-year-old Green (28-3, 25 KOs), a former light heavyweight titleholder, pulled off the mild upset, thus killing Jones-Hopkins II.

 

Dan Rafael is the boxing writer for ESPN.com.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if im wrong but I thought the original argument was over the territory...from what I've read on the net.

 

Green was wanting all PPV for Australia and Hopkins wanted all the PPV in the US. Which appears fair because you would think that the US would generate a heck of alot more money. They apparently agreed on this.

 

The argument happened when Hopkins turned around asking for some of the Aussie PPV as well as all of the US PPV.

 

If in fact this is incorrect and Green is walking away from the fight because he was expecting 50% of everything instead of 40% then he is a royal retard. Hopkins is lucky not to be asking for 35% which in my humble opinion I think would still be suffice for Green. He was even willing to come down to fight in OZ which would have been awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...