Jump to content

Open Letter - Carl Froch


The_budweiser
 Share

Recommended Posts

By Andrew Walker - Congratulations on your win over Andre Dirrell this past weekend Carl. I’m sure you are very pleased to be keeping both your WBC title and your undefeated record and are now looking ahead to your upcoming unification fight with Mikkell Kessler. But come on old chap at best you just earned a very debatable ( I have yet to see a thread on any boxing forum that is pro Carl Froch that doesn’t get swamped by those who believe Dirrell won) decision due in part to the seemingly biased referee. At worst you lost that fight by a few rounds as you were completely outboxed by the less experienced younger man.

 

Personally I had the fight even once Dirrell had been docked the point but either way you looked lost out there Carl. Why don’t you have at the very least a plan B? At this level you cannot expect to win all of your fights on chin and heart alone.. The tactic you employed in that fight for round after round was to walk forward and try to blast Dirrell out with one punch. That tactic may work against lower level opposition or a fellow brawler but against a boxer (a slick, fast one at that) you were made to look stupid and clumsy at times during that fight. I really feel that if you met Dirrell again he would make an easy nights work of you now he has the experience.

 

Up next you will be facing a fellow champion who can both box and trade and I really cannot see how you can win this fight (unless you get another gift decision) using your current style and tactics. You don’t have the speed or reflexes to box with your hands down and you are too reliant on knowing you have a great chin. I don’t think Kessler will stop you but he is going to hurt you and outbox you. You really do have no defence at all (unless you count your face blocking the punches) and this is the key area you will need to address before you get into the ring with the number one man in the super middleweight division.

 

Robert McCracken gives you good advice but he spends half his time trying to get you to listen to him and you still ignore him and go back out and repeat the same old mistakes. The shame is had you not spent much of your career bad mouthing and pointlessly calling out Joe Calzaghe and thus alienating him, you could have called on Joe and Enzo to help assist you in preparing for Mikkell Kessler. You would have learned a lot from the Calzaghe’s but instead your cheap shots and big mouth have prevented this from ever happening and in the long run it is you who will lose out because of it. Despite what you think even you most ardent fans now know that had you ever fought Calzaghe he would have stood you on your head with ease. It’s not even up for debate.

 

So after the Kessler fight you could be sitting on your first defeat. Nothing to be ashamed of as pretty much everyone has Mikkell Kessler as the division number one since Joe retired. But then after that you have to face Arthur Abraham. For me this will be a very exciting fight for the fans to watch as your styles will match up well I believe. But Abraham has all the attributes in equal measure at the very least to you (chin, heart and power) but he also has something that you don’t. He has a good defence. If you try and march down Abraham he will put you to sleep. The best way to defeat Abraham is to outbox him which I just don’t see you being able to do. So after that fight you’re potentially sitting on two losses and out of the tournament as well?

 

Now in the fickle world of boxing these days a fighter with two losses on his career stats gets called a “bum” and the ignorant masses start calling for him to hang up his gloves. That sort of rationale always astounds me but you watch the boxing forums light up with those very words if you lose your next two fights. You will be called a paper champion who lost to the first “prime” world class fighters he faced. The fact that Kessler and Abraham are two of the very best fighters in the division will go largely ignored as the bile pours your way. Just ask Ricky. And remember Hatton was/is a far more popular and loved fighter than any other British boxer since Frank Bruno. If they treated him in that way think how they will maul you.

 

So why not avoid this potential scenario and get back in the gym and add another string to your bow. You have a world class chin with the power to match. You are confident and have a good engine for the twelve rounds if needed. Now if you add some decent defence and movement to that you will be a match for anyone in the division. In fact I would even say a Carl Froch with those attributes could be the new super middleweight king. I applaud the way you have thus far stepped up and taken no easy fights since you became champion. Calzaghe never did what you are doing now until the end of his career and you should be respected and praised for that.

 

I guess though we will find out when you face Mikkell Kessler if you have made the necessary changes or not. I really hope for British boxing you do.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=21596&more=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for that post interesting read. I presume this guy wasnt the biggest of Froch fans to begin with?. That being said a lot of what he said was the truth..

 

 

Looking forward to the Kessler fight, infact im 90% sure ill make the trip out there to cheer Froch on though at this moment in time i think yet again ill be coming home on the back of a defeat by a British boxer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with the writer he made some very valid points Froch does have no plan B or a good defence he has got by so far on his ability to give power punches against lesser opponents but in the league that he finds himself in now defence is just as important,

Against Kessler , Ward & Abraham his face forward style will see him on the end of three defeats.

Rob Mc Cracken good coach that he is is struggling to coach Froch he can say what he likes between rounds but once the bell rings Carl go back to the same routine that lost him the last round,personally I think it's too late for Carl to change but I hope to be proved wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW that article is harsh!!

 

I agree about his defence and his movement but it's a bit OTT, he is talking about an undefeated WBC champion and former british/commonwealth champion, they don't just give these titles out to anyone.

 

Froch is far from perfect but nobody has found a way to beat him yet, although I do think he is in for a tough nights work with Kessler and Abraham.

 

He shouldn't be taking abuse for fighting the 2 best fighters in his division, he should be applauded for it, win or lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANDREW WALKER IS A PIECE OF TURD. and he is the single worst writer i have heard in my life "open letter to carl froch" how gay is that? who does he actually think he is? he is not a boxing pundit but think's he can ran away at a genuine world champion in carl froch.what a turd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANDREW WALKER IS A PIECE OF TURD. and he is the single worst writer i have heard in my life "open letter to carl froch" how gay is that? who does he actually think he is? he is not a boxing pundit but think's he can ran away at a genuine world champion in carl froch.what a turd

 

Excuse me but where was the rant what did Walker write that was not stated by many others more knowledgeable than a lot of posters on here & before you jump on me I'm not including myself in that category, I found his article an honest appraisal of Carl & agree that without tightening his defence he won't be there at the end of this tournament

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANDREW WALKER IS A PIECE OF TURD. and he is the single worst writer i have heard in my life "open letter to carl froch" how gay is that? who does he actually think he is? he is not a boxing pundit but think's he can ran away at a genuine world champion in carl froch.what a turd

 

Excuse me but where was the rant what did Walker write that was not stated by many others more knowledgeable than a lot of posters on here & before you jump on me I'm not including myself in that category, I found his article an honest appraisal of Carl & agree that without tightening his defence he won't be there at the end of this tournament

Its all about opinions telboy...and for me he is talking shite to get noticed....casepoint he writes that he is ignoring McCrackens good advice...how the fuck does he know...its all an assumption based upon snippet of instructions, picked up on camera!! He's being an arse for the sake of being an arse in my book...although .varied opinions make for debate. so I respect your'res!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...